Skip to main content

Table 1 Use of electronic alerts for detection of acute kidney injury in clinical studies

From: Impact of electronic-alerting of acute kidney injury: workgroup statements from the 15th ADQI Consensus Conference

Study

Number of participants

Setting

Process of care

Outcome

Studies reporting on the use of e-alerts without measurement of process of care or outcome

Colpaert (2007) [6]

 

ICU

  

Thomas (2011) [7]

463 patients

2 hospitals

  

Selby (2012) [8]

2619 patients

1 hospital

  

Porter (2014) [9]

15,550 patients/22,754 admissions

2 hospitals

  

Handler (2014) [10]

249 patients

4 nursing homes

  

Wallace (2014) [11]

23,809

Hospital

  

Ahmed (2015) [12]

944

ICU

  

Studies reporting on the use of e-alerts: no improvement reported

Sellier (2009) [13]

603

Hospital

No impact on prescription errors

 

Thomas (2015) [14]

308

Hospital

 

No difference in outcome of AKI

Wilson (2015) [15]

23,664

Hospital

 

No effect on AKI rate

Studies reporting on the use of e-alerts: improvement reported

Rind (1991) [16]

10,076 patients /13,703 admissions

Hospital

Adjustment of medication sooner

 

Rind (1994) [17]

20,228 admissions

Hospital

Adjustment of medication sooner

Decreased risk for AKI

Chertow (2001) [18]

17,828 patients

Hospital

More adequate antibiotic prescription

 

McCoy (2010) [19]

1237 patients

Hospital

More adequate medication prescription

 

Terrel (2010) [20]

2783 patients visits

Emergency room

More adequate dosing

 

Cho (2012) [21]

463 patients

Hospital

More contrast prophylaxis

Less AKI

Colpaert (2012) [22]

951 patients

ICU

More and earlier interventions for AKI

Less progression AKI

Goldstein (2013) [23]

21,807 patients/27,711 admissions

Pediatric hospital

 

Less AKI

Selby (2013) [24]

8411 patients

Hospital

 

Decreased mortality AKI

Claus (2015) [25]

87 patients

ICU

Decrease workload pharmacist

 

Kolhe (2015) [26]

2297 patients

Hospital

 

Less AKI progression Decreased mortality